What are differences between Hamlet the Movie and the Play? Do these differences make the movie more or less effective?
1 Answer | Add Yours
Various film 'interpretations' have been made of Shakespeare's ''Hamlet'', including the one starring Mel Gibson and directed by Franco Zefferelli (1990), as well as other better known ones such as Kenneth Branagh's 1996 take and Laurence Olivier's much earlier version. Actors and directors always have creative freedom to to make some small changes and to 'interpret' various Shakespearean plays in thir own way, as per their own understanding/appreciation, even on stage, so its not unusual to see some adaptations on the screen too, that are somewhat 'difeerent'.
However, a fair amount of negative criticism was levelled at Franco Zeffereli's version starring Mel Gibson, chiefly on these three counts (1) unlike Zeffereli's earlier successful adaptation of ''Romeo and Juliet'' (1968) the setting and ambience of this ''Hamlet'' is seen as rather bizarre by movie critics and reviewers (b) Mel Gibson is criticised as an unlikely Hamlet, and in the view or reviewers, fails to do justice to the play, and to the very complex role of Hamlet-- he isnt an 'intellectual' actor, and more at home with simple ''Lethal Weapon'' type action movies, whereas the action and revenge theme in ''Hamlet'' is not simple and (c) Zeffereli has taken too many and too broad liberties with the original text of ''Hamlet''--changing, dropping, ading lines and scenes etc as he pleased-- and some critics/reviewers feel this ''Hamlet'' isnt ''Hamlet'' at all, but some sort of cinema parody of the play.
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.Join eNotes