President FDR's New Deal prepared America for WWII after the Pearl Harbor attack. In 1930's the US government had strong a strong isolation moventent and isolantist thought the wars in Europe should stay in Europe, and President FDR knew that was not possible so he started the Lend Lease Deal. His Lend Lease Deal with Britian and the Soviet Union helped in giving America ideas on how much power they had. The Lend Lease Deal was that America will loan Britian their guns and ships to attack Germany during the war and when the war is finished they have to return it in a kind matter. The Britian prime minister asked FDR if your nt going to fight in the war can we borrow your guns and ships to fight, and thats when the Lend Lease Deal was put to use. The U.S. had been producing many weapons, and ships, tanks and airplanes to be prepared for war before the bombing of Pearl Harbor, but sense they where not directly in war with anyone they lent their supplies to their allies. These actions where not successful because when Hitler declared war on the U.S., and Japan attacked they didnt have as much supplies as the should have to sustain the war that had lasted them for the next 2 years. America was building up the governments industrial capability so it could help them in producing guns but only for helping their allies to help fight in the war.
2 Answers | Add Yours
I think that there was some progress in mobilizing everyone in the time that they had, but it was a surprise attack. There was still a lot of damage done. There is only so much you can do if you do not know in advance.
Clearly the actions taken by the US government after Pearl Harbor were eventually effective. The government intensified the drafting of men into the military. It instituted things like rationing to make sure that there would be enough in the way of resources for the military to have all the weapons and other supplies that it needed. The government's actions were clearly successful in the long run. We can say this because the US won the war. Of course, this does not mean that the government's actions were 100% efficient or that they were the best possible actions to take. All it tells us is that the actions the government took were sufficient to win the war.
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.Join eNotes