Homework Help

Were the United States's imperialistic ventures at the turn of the century (1898-1920)...

user profile pic

gman1911 | Student, Grade 11 | eNoter

Posted June 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM via web

dislike 1 like
Were the United States's imperialistic ventures at the turn of the century (1898-1920) beneficial for the US or a misfortune for our nation?

Were the United States's imperialistic ventures at the turn of the century (1898-1920) beneficial for the US or a misfortune for our nation?

Tagged with discussion, history

4 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

pohnpei397 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted June 10, 2011 at 1:55 PM (Answer #2)

dislike 0 like

I would argue that the only one of these "ventures" that was an unmitigated success for the US was the annexation of Hawaii.  Other ventures, like the Spanish-American War, brought more misfortune than benefit.

The annexation of Hawaii was beneficial to the US because Hawaii became a state.  Hawaii became an important part of the US economy and is now an integral part of the country.  The only real down side to the annexation was its impact on the native Hawaiians.

Contrast that with our taking of the Philippines in the Spanish-American War.  The main tangible impact of that for the US was that it helped pull us into WWII.  In that case, the US tried to take a possession that was too far away to really be defended.  By doing so, the US ended up having to spend lives and money to defend and then recapture a territory that was never really very useful to the US.

user profile pic

accessteacher | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted June 12, 2011 at 10:29 PM (Answer #3)

dislike 0 like

If you are focusing on the nation of the US, then certainly some ventures were beneficial, such as the acquisition of Hawaii. However, it is always important to look at such issues from both sides. Although Hawaii is now an accepted part of the United States, I don't imagine that they were particularly happy to be annexed at the time. The Spanish-American war, as pointed out above, was a mainly negative venture for the United States.

user profile pic

brettd | High School Teacher | (Level 2) Educator Emeritus

Posted June 13, 2011 at 2:11 AM (Answer #4)

dislike 0 like

Depends on which angle you look at this issue, I suppose.  Becoming a world power with colonies in both hemispheres, the US was able to project its military power and secure resources that have been vital to the growth of the American economy.  It protected trade routes in Asia, and promoted security in the Caribbean.  One could also argue that becoming an empire has hurt American democracy, denied human rights around the world, and made us dependent on foreign energy.

user profile pic

litteacher8 | Middle School Teacher | (Level 1) Distinguished Educator

Posted June 24, 2011 at 12:58 AM (Answer #5)

dislike 0 like
I will concede Hawaii as positive. However, there were failures too. We should have given sovereignty to our "protectorates" of Guam and Puerto Rico by now. Surely we can determine a way to let them have independence while still protecting them. Why have we not just annexed them as states?

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes