Better Students Ask More Questions.
Was Athens more financially stable than Sparta?
2 Answers | add yours
This is a great question. Let me give you two answers.
First, Sparta did not really put that much emphasis on the importance of building their economy. They were more of a military culture and everything was subsumed underneath this goal. They even created a slave class of people to do their work for them (Helots), so that they could train and create the perfect military society.
Second, Athens was nearly the polar opposite of Sparta. Athens was a wealthy city that sought to obtain every economic benefit. They were poised to do this, partially because they were a naval power. This meant that they would be able to travel the sea for trade and commerce. This fact made Athens wealthy in the ancient world.
In conclusion, Athens cared much more about finances than Sparta and this made all the difference.
Posted by readerofbooks on February 9, 2012 at 10:53 PM (Answer #1)
Valedictorian, Tutor, Dean's List
Yes, because Sparta spent more money on training soldiers than on economic benefits, whilst Athens constructed Temples (Parthenon) and had huge markets. Alot of Spartian children died of hunger because of the tough training.
Posted by bbehaghel on February 9, 2012 at 10:45 PM (Answer #2)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.