Summary of the essay "Reflections on Exile" by Edward W. Said
1 Answer | Add Yours
The essay "Reflections on Exile" gives the title to the entire collection and was originally published in 1984. It obviously builds on Said's own condition as an exile as well as on the experiences of other exiled intellectuals that Said encountered in the course of his life. However, Said is careful not to limit his argument to intellectuals and artists: to appreciate the real impact of exile, Said argues,
you must first set aside Joyce and Nabokov and think instead of the uncountable masses for whom UN agencies have been created (page 175)
Said also distinguishes between the glamorous image of the expatriate that comes to mind when we think about Hemingway and the Paris of the 1920s and the forced exile of masses of people who did not freely choose to abandon their homeland and will probably never return to it. Exile is equated in the essay with non-belonging, with the loss of contact with the native land. Said emphasizes the material and historical conditions of exile which cannot be sublimated by literary efforts. Rather than focusing simply on the poetry of exile, Said urges to take into account the poet in exile, the person who experiences uprootedness and homelessness.
The essay continues with the analysis of the earlier poems of Mahmoud Darwish and of Joseph Conrad's story "Amy Foster", a piece that, like most of his literary production, bears the marks of Conrad's own position as an émigré. Because literature gives exiles the possibility of creating a world of their own, it is not surprising that so many exiles have become writers. Here Said quotes the Hungarian Marxist critic Lukàs who experienced exile himself and defined the novel as the literary form to give shape to the feeling of "transcendental homelessness" in which the European novel is grounded.
The final part of the essay defines exile as a contrapuntual and endless condition. The first characteristic derives from the fact that adapting to the new conditions of life in exile is always done against the previous sets of memories of living in the homeland. Exile, in this sense, can be enlightening as it gives the person who experiences it multiple perspectives on life. On the other hand, exile becomes an endless process as by its very nature "is never the state of being satisfied, placid or secure." (page 186).
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.Join eNotes