Analyze why social differences, in America, was a reason for change in resolving political disputes through compromise in 1860.
5 Answers | Add Yours
Are you sure this is the exact wording of your question? It does not make a lot of sense.
Social differences mattered because they made the North and South so different that they didn't trust each other. The North was egalitarian and democratic. The South was hierarchical and aristocratic. But that doesn't change in 1860. So I'm not exactly sure what you're asking.
In response to post #2..In the early nineteenth century, Americans sought to resolve their political disputes through compromise, yet by 1860 this no longer seemed possible. Do you think social differences was a reason for change?
Recently, historians have argued that Southern politicians were increasingly uneasy that free-soil ideology might gain a foothold among non-slaveholding whites, who were expanding in numbers during this period. These anxieties, born of social causes, made southern leaders more aggressive and less willing to compromise. There certainly was growing inequality in the South among whites. In fact, the percentage of whites who owned slaves had been decreasing in the South ahead of the Civil War, even as the number of slaves in the region increased.
In 1857, there was a book, The Impending Crisis, published by Hinton Rowan Helper, a southern white man who was opposed to slavery for class reasons (as was typical of Free Soilers, he was not exactly racially enlightened). It terrified Southern slaveholders, who actually tried to have northern congressmen who had endorsed it barred from taking their seats. Here is a link to it: http://docsouth.unc.edu/nc/helper/helper.html
Generally, Northerners became less tolerant of slavery as an institution, though their reasons were primarily political, not social. The fugitive slave law and bloody border conflicts in Kansas contributed to this, and made Northerners less willing to compromise.
One social difference that made compromise very difficult by 1860 was that the south still depended mainly on slave-supported agriculture, whereas the north had become much more rapidly industrialized. Many southerners believed that if slavery were abolished quickly, their economy would be badly damaged.
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.Join eNotes