Better Students Ask More Questions.
What are the distinguishing differences between classical and operant conditioning?
1 Answer | add yours
High School Teacher
Skinner's operant conditioning was developed after Pavlov's classical conditioning. Classical conditioning, coined by Ivan Pavlov, relies on two very specific elements: the environmental stimulus and the naturally occurring reflex. With classical conditioning, an environmental stimulus is programmed to elicit (cause to occur) a naturally existing reflex. For example, when experimenting with dogs and salivation, Pavlov took the naturally existing reflex of salivating and paired it with a preceding ring of a bell, which was the environmental stimulus. Pavlov changed the behavior of a dog salivating at the sight of food to salivating at the sound of ringing of a bell: the reflex was displaced to attach to a new stimulus that came before the reflex.
In operant conditioning, a behavior is learned through punishment and reward that follows, or comes after, a given behavior. This learning is based upon cognition and not on a naturally existing reflex, which is an important point in which it differs from classical conditioning. In B.F. Skinner's experiments, rats were placed in "Skinner Boxes" and received electrical shocks when the researcher determined to deliver them. The shocks revealed the rats' comprehension of negative punishment. Therefore, in operant conditioning behavior is allowed to occur, then the positive or negative stimulus is applied or withheld.
Thus, the differences between operant and classical conditioning lies in the application of the environmental stimulus prior to a naturally existing reflex in classical or following the occurrence of a designated behavior in operant.
Posted by literaturenerd on July 12, 2013 at 8:14 PM (Answer #1)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.