1 Answer | Add Yours
I think that the President's recent decision to allow states to opt out of No Child Left Behind mandates represents a national education policy constructed in the light of federalism. The policy allows states to construct their own education model, helping to substantiate the concept of federalism in shared powers between state and federal governments in matters concerning the welfare of the people. The federal government's mandate of No Child Left Behind can be permuted by states who wish to develop their own plan towards ensuring children are meeting core standards in their learning. This represents the federalism concept in a couple of ways. The first way is that it shows how education is a concern of both the federal and the state government, showing a relationship of federalism between both. Additionally, the waiver element empowers states to assess their own needs and develop education requirements that are applicable to their particular condition. This helps to uphold the federalism principle because it recognizes the rights and powers of state governments to determine what is best for their own people in conjunction with federal mandates. In this, one sees how federalism plays a distinct role in the construction of national government education policies.
We’ve answered 330,665 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question