1 Answer | Add Yours
The opening to your paper, and in fact, the whole of what you are going to write is dependent on what you have to prove. Without really knowing the focus of the analytical, the start of your paper is going to be difficult. Given the small amount known, we can establish a couple of potential openings, though. The first would be to open with an critical overview of Dickinson's poem. Seeing that you are going to talk to the point of how you analyze the poem or critically dissect it, perhaps it might be good for you to open the paper with how critics have viewed the poem. What do they think the poem means in reference to Dickinson's life and her body of work, in general? It would not have to be much, but rather a critical overview of sorts, as I imagine that you would be coming back to this in the course of your paper. Another approach, if you would be allowed to do so, would be to simply open with your own initial thoughts about the poem. Discussing what attracted you to this poem, how you felt intrigued by it, and how it opened up some door of perception to you might be insightful. Yet one more might be to discuss the historical background of the poem from your own research. What was the motivation for Dickinson to write the poem? Were there any specific conditions that gave rise to it? Perhaps opening with the background of the poem might ease the transition to analyzing it. These might be a potential starting points for your paper. Since the opening is usually one of the last portions written, it might be important for you to establish the direction of the paper first and then write the introduction.
We’ve answered 396,714 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question