Homework Help

Identify one anti-war argument made by protesters of the Vietnam War, and one pro-war...

user profile pic

juicylady | Student, Undergraduate | (Level 1) eNoter

Posted July 24, 2009 at 11:50 AM via web

dislike 1 like

Identify one anti-war argument made by protesters of the Vietnam War, and one pro-war argument made by supporters of the war.

2 Answers | Add Yours

Top Answer

user profile pic

Susan Hurn | College Teacher | (Level 1) Educator Emeritus

Posted July 24, 2009 at 2:43 PM (Answer #1)

dislike 1 like

The most commonly held pro-war argument concerned the spread of Communism in Indochina. Many believed that if South Vietnam fell to the North Vietnamese Communist regime, it would create a "domino effect," and the surrounding countries of Laos and Thailand would then be weakened and come under Communist control. This was seen as an international threat to the United States and Western democracies.

The anti-war movement focused on the terrible death and destruction suffered by the Vietnamese people of both the North and the South as the result of U.S. military warfare. In addition to civilian casualties, much of South Vietnam especially was devastated by massive bombing and the use of napalm. Many villages and farm fields were destroyed. Horrendous pictures coming out of the war showed the effects of the war on the Vietnamese, including the suffering and displacement of the children. These graphic images further fueled the anti-war movement who argued that the war represented the misuse of American military power.

user profile pic

mwestwood | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted July 25, 2009 at 3:41 AM (Answer #2)

dislike 1 like

In July of 1966 Lyndon B. Johnson said,

We are not trying to wipe out North Vietnam.  We are not trying to change their government.  We are not trying to establish permanent bases in South Vietnam...We are there because we are trying to make the Communists of North Vietname stop shooting at their neighbors..to demonstrate that guerilla warfare, inspired by one nation against another nation can never succeed....We must keep on until the Communists in North Vietnam realize the price of agression is too high--and either agree to a peaceful settlement or to stop their fighting.

This was Johnson's argument for entering Vietnam as he played upon the Americans' fears that Communism was a universal threat. 

In August of 1964 Johnson said the North Vietnamese forces had twice attacked American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.  Known today as the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, this led to the open involvement of the U.S. in the Vietnam Conflict.

Before his death, Robert S. McNamara, former Secretary of Defense under President Johnson, admitted that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was completely orchestrated in order to persuade Congress to agree to war.  After this criminal admission, McNamara begged forgiveness for the senseless deaths of 50,000+ American soldiers, not to mention the countless disabled and mentally damaged soldiers.

Besides the false pretenses given as justification for entering Vietnam, a very strong argument against the Vietnam Conflict--interestingly, it was never named "a war" while it was going on--was the fact that this was really a civil war within the country of Vietnam, and by this fact, there was no reason for the involvement of the United States.  

This interference of the United States into the civil war of Vietnam initiated the perception of many countries of America as an imperialistic interference.

 

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes