How does Quine justify admitting numbers and classes, but not properties or propositions in his ontology?

1 Answer | Add Yours

karythcara's profile pic

Posted on

The justification is that Quine is an empiricist though not a nominalist. As such, he prefers to take into account transcendence "transcendent individuals." This is in opposition to "concrete individuals." Quine's essential ontology is "pure sets."


We’ve answered 324,062 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question