1 Answer | Add Yours
In the last pages of the book, Diamond addresses the issues in a very systematic way in which he compares history to various sorts of sciences. Diamond thinks that history should be studied more in the way that the sciences are studied. He realizes, however, that this sounds odd to many people. Therefore, he looks at how history compares to various sciences. He says that history cannot be like a science like chemistry where experiments are possible. However, he says it can be like sciences such as climatology or paleontology where experiments are not possible. Diamond systematically examines ways in which "historical sciences" are different from other sciences. Thus, we can say that Diamond addresses these issues in a systematic and comparative way.
We’ve answered 333,777 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question