2 Answers | Add Yours
Although it sounds paradoxical, Jordan's statement does, in fact, make perfect sense!
Think about it this way--if you are in a room full of 100 people, and you are speaking to someone next to you, chances are that no one else in the room is listening in to your conversation--they can't! There would be too much noise and commotion and far too many distractions.
However, if you are at a small gathering of say 15 people, the chance that ALL guests are involved in conversation on one topic increases. Also, if you are engaged in a one-on-one conversation at this smaller party, the odds are greater that someone will overhear what's being said or that someone will come to your table and try to join in the conversation.
So, when Jordan says large parties are intimate, she means that large parties offer the opportunity for discussions in smaller groups that will not be overheard by all, whereas at a small party, everyone is aware of what everyone else is saying.
It's easier to get away unnoticed in a large crowd and spend time alone with someone than it would be if you were with a small group (everyone would notice you were gone right away).
We’ve answered 333,851 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question