Homework Help

Explain how Bertram Cates technically "won" the case despite the fact that he was found...

user profile pic

brhs | Student, Grade 11 | eNotes Newbie

Posted April 18, 2007 at 6:24 AM via web

dislike 2 like

Explain how Bertram Cates technically "won" the case despite the fact that he was found guilty.

2 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

gbeatty | College Teacher | (Level 1) Educator Emeritus

Posted April 18, 2007 at 8:53 AM (Answer #1)

dislike 0 like

A good question. Cates was found guilty of teaching evolution. If you judge the case based on the simple verdict of guilt or innocence, he lost. However, if you look at the issue in a larger context, he won. A huge amount of public attention was put on this matter. Henry Drummond defends the case as an issue of free thought, and the media makes fun of the fundamentalist position. The result is that science wins and a certain kind of religious position loses, and so Cates won.

Sources:

user profile pic

cheesepie14 | Student | eNoter

Posted April 11, 2009 at 3:50 AM (Answer #2)

dislike 0 like

Bert Cates won because his lawyer showed all the holes in the Creationist theory. He was found guilty of teaching evolution, but that was not the point.

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes