Does the size of a hospital affect the quality of care that a patient receives?
2 Answers | Add Yours
I do not think that it is a steadfast assurance that the size of the hospital is the most relevant trait in determining the quality of care that a patient receives. Certainly, doctors and nurses would play far more of an impactful role in the delivery of quality health care. Good doctors and good nursing staffs can be found in big and small hospitals and I think that these are probably more essential in the delivery of quality health care. That being said, I do believe that in a for- profit configuration of health care services, there can be more opportunities available in larger and more financially secure hospitals than in smaller ones. This might be seen in equipment or latest technologies used to assist medical professionals, satellite hospitals nearer to the home of the patient, or more expansive and a greater array of hospital services offered. In a for- profit scenario, the bigger and more well endowed a hospital is, the greater the resources it can pass on to its patients. This does not automatically guarantee better health care. However, it does provide more opportunities to pursue it. I would say that this sector is where size and money play a large role in the quality of health care provided.
Never, the size never differs the quality of a hospital. But the doctors, nurses and the communication between doctors and patient thus differ a lot.
Being a doctor gives you certain rights and privileges. In return you must fulfill the duties and responsibilities of a doctor. The principles of good medical practice and the standards of competence, care, and conduct expected of you in all aspects of your professional work, are described in this booklet. They apply to all doctors. If serious problems arise which call your conduct into question, these are the standards against which you will be judged.
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.Join eNotes