Homework Help

Discuss the significance of recent court rulings addressing the admissibility of DNA...

user profile pic

lnknparkchick84 | Student, Undergraduate | (Level 2) Honors

Posted February 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM via web

dislike 0 like

Discuss the significance of recent court rulings addressing the admissibility of DNA evidence in the courtroom.

3 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

darlyn123 | eNotes Newbie

Posted February 10, 2011 at 3:35 AM (Answer #1)

dislike 0 like

by admissibility of DNA how will they solve anything?!

user profile pic

imarion | (Level 1) eNoter

Posted June 13, 2011 at 7:40 PM (Answer #2)

dislike 0 like

The popular perception is that DNA speaks the truth -- you're either guilty or you're innocent, there's no ambiguity. But DNA is only a tool. It gives information depending on the nature of the samples and how well the analysis is done. "Garbage in, garbage out" is one concern, and the risk of overstating the implications of the evidence is another.

torrents download

user profile pic

emelie23 | Student, Undergraduate | (Level 1) eNoter

Posted June 26, 2011 at 4:53 PM (Answer #3)

dislike 0 like

All forensic methods for individualization—fingerprints, dental impressions, striations on bullets, hair and fiber comparisons, voice spectrograms, neutron-activation analysis, blood-grouping and serum-protein and enzyme typing, as well as DNA profiling—demand an ability to match samples with reasonable accuracy with respect to characteristics that can help to differentiate one source from another. If such evidence is to be useful in court, scientifically acceptable procedures must permit the reliable measurement and comparison of physical features. Likewise, a scientific basis must exist for concluding that properly performed comparisons can distinguish possible sources.

verified torrents

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes