Better Students Ask More Questions.
Argue that President Truman's decision to use atomic bombs against Japan was justified.
2 Answers | add yours
To make this argument, we should focus on the number of lives that were saved by this decision. It is of course true that the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki suffered terribly because of the bombs. But it is likely that many more people would have suffered and died had the bomb not been used. The military estimated that 1 million Americans would be killed or wounded in an invasion of Japan. It is certain that Japanese casualties would have been even higher. Therefore, the use of the bombs can be justified as a way of saving lives, both American and Japanese.
Posted by pohnpei397 on October 29, 2012 at 11:01 PM (Answer #1)
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki gave the Japanese an excuse for surrendering unconditionally. Otherwise, they seemed prepared to fight for every inch of their homeland. Furthermore, once the United States had the atomic bomb it had to show that it was willing to use it. And after dropping the bomb on Hiroshima, it was necessary to drop another one in order to prove that the U.S. had a supply of such bombs. The U.S. wanted to prove this not only to Japan but to the world at large, and especially to the U.S.S.R. It is quite true that the atom bombs actually saved lives on both sides. The Americans could see what resistance the Japanese were capable of by observing what happened at Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and the suicide attacks on the fleet. Most Americans did not have the slightest idea that such things as atom bombs existed or were possible to make. It was all very much top secret.
Posted by billdelaney on December 25, 2013 at 12:01 AM (Answer #2)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.