Better Students Ask More Questions.
How does O'Brien's interrogation of Winston in the Minstry of Love relate to the...
1 Answer | add yours
In 1984, George Orwell's ominous vision of the near future, Winston Smith, the protagonist, finds himself in a world that actively seeks to suppress any attempts to think independently. As an employee of the Ministry of Truth, Winston sees the evidence of these attempts. As part of his job, Winston "rectifies" past newspaper articles that provide information possibly damaging to the Party and to the reputation of Big Brother. In addition, Syme, a colleague, actively works to develop a revised dictionary of Newspeak, an abbreviated language intended to weed out any language with even shades of ambiguity in its meaning, thereby eliminating the majority of the words in the English. These efforts ultimately result in filtering not only the information the general population receives about its government and its foreign relations but also the very language in which it is expressed. As a result, the average person only sees what the Party wants them to see, and the average person, having an increasingly smaller vocabulary, cannot formulate any resistance to the Party. They literally cannot express themselves.
Winston is well aware of these possible consequences when he meets Julia, someone he feels has a similar attitude toward the Party as he does. During their "relationship," they endanger their "freedom" by speaking out about the Party (though semi-cautiously). Ultimately, they are turned in and sent to the Ministry of Love. In O'Brien's interrogation of Winston, he seeks to break down the foundations of Winston's knowledge. In its place, O'Brien seeks to build a epistemological structure based on "truths" held by the Party, with the ultimate result being Winston's inability to question ideas put forth by the Party.
Orwell provides numerous instances throughout Winston's interrogation to this effect. Perhaps the most noteworthy is O'Brien's ability to convince Winston to accept that "2+2=5." This clearly runs counter to accepted mathematical truth. It represents the destruction of rational thought in the sense that the possibility that "2+2=4" is not discounted, for, according to "doublethink," one can hold contradictory ideas at the same time. Furthermore, it brings all of Winston's assumptions into question, replacing them with ideas without any rational basis. Their only basis is that the Party mandates them as truth. The individual's ability to reason is replaced by the will of the Party - no thought needed.
Posted by ecofan74 on June 17, 2010 at 7:48 AM (Answer #1)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.