Better Students Ask More Questions.
In light of court cases holding bartenders liable for serving alcohol to someone who...
1 Answer | add yours
This is an interesting problem and hinges on the difference between a current state of an individual and a predisposition. A bartender can be expected to identify obvious symptoms of drunkenness and withhold alcohol. On the other hand, a bartender could not be expected to diagnose an underlying predisposition to alcoholism. In other words, if an alcoholic who is perfectly sober at the moment, walks into a bar and orders a beer, the bartender is not expected to somehow divine the underlying medical condition and refuse the person the beer.
Similarly, there is no way that someone at the counter of a convenience store selling lotto tickets could reasonably be expected to diagnose gambling addiction in a customer who asks for a lotto ticket along with a soda and bag of pretzels, for example.
Posted by thanatassa on December 7, 2012 at 6:04 AM (Answer #1)
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.