Homework Help

What is the best way of structuring a comparative language analysis essay?  

user profile pic

meowththth | Student | (Level 3) eNoter

Posted May 15, 2012 at 11:22 AM via web

dislike 1 like

What is the best way of structuring a comparative language analysis essay?

 

2 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

readerofbooks | College Teacher | (Level 2) Educator Emeritus

Posted May 16, 2012 at 4:10 AM (Answer #1)

dislike 0 like

This is a great question. In all papers, you will need a few elements. 

First and most important you will need a thesis. So, after you read all three articles, create a strong thesis statement. In a word, a thesis statement is a the main point of your paper, the very point that you are seeking to prove. 

Second, after you have a thesis statement, seek to prove your thesis based on the three articles that you have read. Also keep in mind that you can draw from other sources. The more cogent your points are the more persuasive your thesis will be. You supporting points (body paragraphs) will be the meat of your paper. 

Finally, you should conclude your paper by summarizing your argument. Let me give you an example. If you are arguing that one word in language x was transformed to another word in language y and z, then you will seek to prove this point with evidence. You might ask: "how do you know this?" "What is the evidence?" 

user profile pic

thanatassa | College Teacher | (Level 2) Educator Emeritus

Posted June 29, 2015 at 11:13 AM (Answer #2)

dislike 0 like

A comparative language analysis is a form of rhetorical analysis. To structure your essay, you need to decide first on two things, your major thesis and what particular features of the language of the three articles you will be analyzing to support that thesis. This leads to two possible structures:

  1. An introduction, one section on each article, and a conclusion.
  2. An introduction, one section one each of three to five major aspects of the language of the articles, and then a conclusion.

The first method is somewhat weaker, as it is not structured analytically, and tends to fall into summary rather than analysis. The second method allows you to focus more clearly on language features, using the articles to illustrate your points.

How much you need to use metadiscourse and structural transitions depends on the length of your essay. For a short essay, of under 1,000 words or so, you can simply using headings; for a longer essay, the end of your introduction should include a structural preview of what you intend to argue in what order. 

Sources:

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes