Homework Help

Beard vs. Roche Compare/Contrast the argument of Beard and Roche in regard of the...

user profile pic

brainstorm15 | Student, Undergraduate | Honors

Posted September 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM via web

dislike 0 like
Beard vs. Roche

Compare/Contrast the argument of Beard and Roche in regard of the Constituion and Founding fathers

2 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

litteacher8 | Middle School Teacher | (Level 1) Distinguished Educator

Posted September 23, 2012 at 12:54 AM (Answer #2)

dislike 0 like

The main difference between Beard and Roche’s theories of the constitution’s creation is the idea of motivation.  Beard believed that the constitution was created for economic reasons, and that its sole purpose was to balance economic interests and create a strong economy.  Roche, on the other hand, believed that the motivation in how the constitution was written was compromise, to make sure all factions and interests were balanced.

user profile pic

rrteacher | College Teacher | (Level 1) Educator Emeritus

Posted September 23, 2012 at 11:53 PM (Answer #3)

dislike 0 like

The difference is a little more stark than that. The Beards indeed argued that the Framers were driven by economic motives, but their motive was not simply to create a strong economy for everyone. Rather it was to benefit their own economic interests, and those of people whom they believed to share their class interests. John Roche dismissed the idea that class had much of anything to do with the framing of the Constitution, suggesting, as the preceding post says, that the document represented a reconciliation of varying interests. He essentially said that though the Framers only represented a wealthy elite, they formed a document that, in its completed form, was reflective of a national consensus. This ideal of national political unity trumped whatever self-interest, or class interest, they may have felt. 

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes