Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity | Historiography, Sources in

Suppressing, denying, or eliminating evidence of genocide is patently wrong. Morally and ethically, justice ought to mean the punishment of all culprits—political, religious, and media leaders from afar, and executioners in the killing fields alike—in proportion to their misdeeds. The duty of professionals assigned to study specific cases is to record legitimate, authentic documentation, not to prepare prosecutions or facilitate harmony. Meticulously and accurately—in the original language to prevent any misunderstandings and the potential loss of context in translation—reconstructing criminal events is their primary responsibility.

An expert analysis of personal testaments and written submissions by eyewitnesses to mass murders, particularly in terms of their inclusion in academic scholarship or journalistic publications, is highly problematic, especially in traditional cultures. Dilemmas concern the enormous risks...