Home > Frankenstein Summary & Study Guide > Frankenstein Group > Discussion Board

I need a in depth analysis of why the monster character versus what it does.

I'd suggest a slightly different category:  man vs. society.  I don't know why this doesn't get more play.  The creature represents a fully grown "natural" man without any "nurture" to explain his development.  Shelley sends him out into the world, a creature only seeking to be loved despite his misshappen appearance, to see if it supports his natural goodness of spirit or destroys it.

This was a not uncommon theme as people moved away from nature (the farm) and into the city where they lived and work in close proximity with strangers and live far from the "nature" that the Romantics found so renewing.

So what happens when you take man out of nature and place him in "society"?  Not many good things in this book; not many good things in the many books that consider this same issue.

I think you can take it from here.

I agree with Tim.  The creature acts out against Victor (man vs. man), however, in doing so, he kills many members of Victor's society--family and friends.  He also draws Victor out of society and into the cold regions of the antarctic where he leaves him food and directions so they could continue their strange "relationship" until one or the other dies.  At this point in the story, they need each other--the creature needs Victor for company and entertainment and Victor needs the creature as a target for his rage and revenge.   In addition, the creature has several negative experiences with humans in general--the town where they all run from him, the de Lacey family who faint as the sight of him and beat him with a stick, then who abandon him even though they were unaware that he considered himself as part of their family unit.