Criticism > Drama Criticism > Beckett, Samuel - Robert Wilcher (essay date summer 1976)
Beckett, Samuel - Robert Wilcher (essay date summer 1976)
Robert Wilcher (essay date summer 1976)
SOURCE: Wilcher, Robert. “‘What's It Meant to Mean?’ An Approach to Beckett's Theatre.” Critical Quarterly (summer 1976): 9-37.
[In the following essay, Wilcher maintains that in his works, Beckett strives to defy definition and leave the audience/readers disconcerted, yet searching for their own understanding.]
Just as the ‘quality of language’ in Proust was more important than ‘any system of ethics or aesthetics’ [according to Beckett], so the quality of an experience in Beckett's theatre becomes more important than any system of ‘meaning’ that might be extracted from the words of the text or from the ‘symbolism’ of the sets, characters, and actions. A dramatic art is created that is ‘symbolic without symbolism’.
The purpose of this article is to explore further the implications of [his] statement ‘form is content, content is form’ for...
[The entire page is 4680 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism: General Commentary
- Jean-Jacques Mayoux (essay date October 1957)
- Eva Metman (essay date January 1960)
- Jacques Guicharn and June Beckelman (essay date 1961)
- Ruby Cohn (essay date spring-summer 1962)
- Robert Wilcher (essay date summer 1976)
- Steven Connor (essay date 1990)
- Keir Elam (essay date 1994)
- Enoch Brater (essay date 1997)
- Andrew Kennedy (essay date 1997)
- Paul Lawley (essay date January 2000)
- William S. Haney II (essay date fall 2001)
- Criticism: En Attendant Godot (Waiting For Godot)
- Criticism: Fin De Partie (Endgame)
- Criticism: Spiel (Play)
- Criticism: That Time
- Criticism: EleuthéRia
- Further Reading
- Copyright
