Creationism vs. Evolution
Creationism vs. Evolution | New Creationists and Their Discredited Arguments
Michael Ruse is professor of philosophy and zoology at Canada’s University of Guelph. The author of Taking Darwin Seriously and But Is It Science?, he participated in a debate on creationism and evolution on “Firing Line” in December 1997.
Summary: A new school of creationism has arisen from the ashes of the old. Its proponents offer the same arguments as before with one major difference, namely, reliance upon science to support the biblical argument of a six-day creation and a six thousand-year-old earth. Despite the new...
[The entire page is 3996 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Table of Contents
- Gradual Change Explains How Evolution Works
- The Concept of Gradual Evolution Is Flawed
- “Creationism” Should Not Be Taught in Science Classrooms
- “Scientific Creationism” Should Be Taught in Science Classrooms
- Physical Laws Support Creationism
- The Second Law of Thermodynamics May Favor Evolution
- Life Originated by Design
- New Creationists and Their Discredited Arguments
- The Fossil Record Supports Evolution
- Evolution by Design Succeeds Where Darwin Fails
- Evolution Is Consistent with Belief in God
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Creationism vs. Evolution at eNotes.
