Creationism vs. Evolution
Creationism vs. Evolution | Evolution by Design Succeeds Where Darwin Fails
Jonathan Wells holds doctorates in both biology (University of California at Berkeley) and theology (Yale). When he wrote this article, he was a postdoctoral research biologist in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, and a fellow of the Discovery Institute in Seattle.
Summary: Evolutionary biologists reject the idea of design in evolution. They fully support Darwin’s concept of natural selection, which implies that change is governed by chance alone. Yet the evidence demonstrates that Darwin’s theory...
[The entire page is 2723 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Table of Contents
- Gradual Change Explains How Evolution Works
- The Concept of Gradual Evolution Is Flawed
- “Creationism” Should Not Be Taught in Science Classrooms
- “Scientific Creationism” Should Be Taught in Science Classrooms
- Physical Laws Support Creationism
- The Second Law of Thermodynamics May Favor Evolution
- Life Originated by Design
- New Creationists and Their Discredited Arguments
- The Fossil Record Supports Evolution
- Evolution by Design Succeeds Where Darwin Fails
- Evolution Is Consistent with Belief in God
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Creationism vs. Evolution at eNotes.
