Creationism vs. Evolution
Creationism vs. Evolution | The Concept of Gradual Evolution Is Flawed
Michael J. Behe is Associate Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University. His field of specialization is molecular biology.
Summary: Charles Darwin himself wrote that his theory of evolution would “break down” if it were proven that any complex organ could not have developed over a long period of time in gradual increments. Modern molecular biology has helped prove that there are certain complex organs in both animals and insects that could not have evolved by gradual, successive additions. The concept of irreducible complexity helps...
[The entire page is 3598 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Table of Contents
- Gradual Change Explains How Evolution Works
- The Concept of Gradual Evolution Is Flawed
- “Creationism” Should Not Be Taught in Science Classrooms
- “Scientific Creationism” Should Be Taught in Science Classrooms
- Physical Laws Support Creationism
- The Second Law of Thermodynamics May Favor Evolution
- Life Originated by Design
- New Creationists and Their Discredited Arguments
- The Fossil Record Supports Evolution
- Evolution by Design Succeeds Where Darwin Fails
- Evolution Is Consistent with Belief in God
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Creationism vs. Evolution at eNotes.
