Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Williams, Tennessee (Vol. 30) - Robert B. Heilman
Williams, Tennessee (Vol. 30) - Robert B. Heilman
ROBERT B. HEILMAN
Since Tennessee Williams has had a persistent interest in the idea of tragedy, there is good reason for looking at his serious plays in the light of a theory of tragedy. In this essay the term tragedy is used for a drama that is centrally concerned with a split personality, not a pathological split, such as Williams sometimes dramatizes, but a representative division between the different imperatives and impulses that human beings feel. A tragic character is strong enough so that an impulse that drives him can be destructive rather than simply annoying, and so that some kind of reordering is imaginable for him. Since reordering implies consciousness of what one is and has done, a tragic character needs the kind of intelligence that will make him more than a blind automaton in action and feeling. (p. 770)
In his earlier plays Williams tends to focus his attention on characters who don't come through, who because of some weakness or...
[The entire page is 868 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Howard Barnes
- Richard Watts, Jr.
- Louis Kronenberger
- Wolcott Gibbs
- Kappo Phelan
- Joseph Wood Krutch
- John Mason Brown
- Rosamond Gilder
- Harry Taylor
- Harold Clurman
- George Jean Nathan
- W. David Sievers
- Eric Bentley
- Joseph Wood Krutch
- Kenneth Tynan
- John Gassner
- C. N. Stavrou
- Winifred L. Dusenbury
- Marion Magid
- Robert B. Heilman
- R. H. Gardner
- Leonard Berkman
- Martin Gottfried
- Harold Clurman
- Leonard Quirino
- Normand Berlin
- Copyright
