Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Williams, Tennessee (Vol. 30) - Normand Berlin
Williams, Tennessee (Vol. 30) - Normand Berlin
NORMAND BERLIN
Each new production of A Streetcar Named Desire seems to offer the excitement of witnessing a new interpretation. A great play has within it the potentiality for differing interpretations; indeed, this may be the test of greatness. The different interpretations of Streetcar by directors invariably stem from different attitudes toward the two main characters, Blanche DuBois and Stanley Kowalski. Some directors tip the audience toward Blanche, others toward Stanley—and this tipping controls the nature of the tragedy and its effect. The director chooses sides, and the audience, of necessity, must play the director's game.
My aim in this essay is to explore the possibility that Tennessee Williams wishes to keep the sides balanced, that, in fact, complementarity informs the play's art and meaning. (p. 97)
At the outset we must recognize that different interpretations can be caused by fuzziness of writing, blurring of effects,...
[The entire page is 1321 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Howard Barnes
- Richard Watts, Jr.
- Louis Kronenberger
- Wolcott Gibbs
- Kappo Phelan
- Joseph Wood Krutch
- John Mason Brown
- Rosamond Gilder
- Harry Taylor
- Harold Clurman
- George Jean Nathan
- W. David Sievers
- Eric Bentley
- Joseph Wood Krutch
- Kenneth Tynan
- John Gassner
- C. N. Stavrou
- Winifred L. Dusenbury
- Marion Magid
- Robert B. Heilman
- R. H. Gardner
- Leonard Berkman
- Martin Gottfried
- Harold Clurman
- Leonard Quirino
- Normand Berlin
- Copyright
