Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Williams, Tennessee (Vol. 30) - Leonard Quirino
Williams, Tennessee (Vol. 30) - Leonard Quirino
LEONARD QUIRINO
So much has been written about A Streetcar Named Desire in terms of its theatrical presentation as interpreted by a specific director and set of actors and so much concern has been lavished on the social attitudes and psychological constitution of its characters that the author's primary intention as revealed in his use of mythic symbolism and archetypal imagery to create a dialectic between soul and body to depict universally significant problems such as the conflict and mutual attraction between desire and death has been generally obscured or denigrated as pretentious. My own intention in this essay is to consider the play neither as interpreted in any specific production nor as it may embody a study of satyriasis, nymphomania, or reconstruction in the South, but, rather, as it constitutes what an examination of its symbolism reveals to be Tennessee Williams' intention: a tragic parable dramatizing existence, the fact of incarnation, itself....
[The entire page is 3222 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Howard Barnes
- Richard Watts, Jr.
- Louis Kronenberger
- Wolcott Gibbs
- Kappo Phelan
- Joseph Wood Krutch
- John Mason Brown
- Rosamond Gilder
- Harry Taylor
- Harold Clurman
- George Jean Nathan
- W. David Sievers
- Eric Bentley
- Joseph Wood Krutch
- Kenneth Tynan
- John Gassner
- C. N. Stavrou
- Winifred L. Dusenbury
- Marion Magid
- Robert B. Heilman
- R. H. Gardner
- Leonard Berkman
- Martin Gottfried
- Harold Clurman
- Leonard Quirino
- Normand Berlin
- Copyright
