Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Updike, John (Vol. 15) - YVES Le PELLEC

1. Printable Version
2. Download PDF
3. Cite this Page
4. Tweet This

YVES Le PELLEC

The interest of Updike as a moral fabulist is that his judgments are never univocal. By his own avowal, he has too much tenderness for his characters to condemn their follies. On the other hand, his sense of humor and his ethics do not permit him to let their foibles go unnoticed. He himself acknowledges this duality when he affirms that all his work says "Yes, but." We find the same ambivalence in the definition he gives of the people he considers as spiritually alive: "I feel that to be a person is to be in a situation of tension, is to be in a dialectical situation." Most of the charm of Updike's protagonists in general, and of Harry Angstrom in particular, is that, close to them as we may feel, we can never really anticipate the inconclusive ending to which their contradictions will lead them. We do not even know where Rabbit is heading at the end of Rabbit, Run. Perhaps it is because of this ultimate ambiguity that his existence leaves...

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

eNotes Pass

1. Introduction
2. YVES Le PELLEC
3. George W. Hunt, S.J.
4. Margaret Drabble
5. John Romano
6. Anatole Broyard
7. ABIGAIL McCARTHY
8. Doris Grumbach
9. Daphne Merkin
10. Martha Heimberg
11. David Evanier
12. Copyright

1. John Updike