Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Miller, Arthur (Vol. 26) - Neil Carson

1. Printable Version
2. Download PDF
3. Cite this Page
4. Tweet This

NEIL CARSON

An individual's assessment of Miller as a playwright will depend,… on his own biases and presuppositions. If he is primarily interested in theatrical experimentation and novelty, he will find little to interest him in the plays. Miller's explorations of form have never taken him far from the highroad of realism…. From the rich storehouse of theatrical trickery accumulated in this century by the expressionists, symbolists, surrealists or absurdists, Miller has borrowed practically nothing.

This is not to suggest that Miller has been indifferent to dramatic form. Quite the contrary. Indeed each new play has been a fresh attempt to find a suitable vehicle for his dramatic vision. When he has experimented with modernist techniques, however, it has always been in an effort to make his characters more psychologically real, never to render them mechanical, faceless or depersonalised. It has been to render the causal connections between things more...

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

eNotes Pass

1. Introduction
2. John Gassner
3. Sighle Kennedy
4. Robert Warshow
5. George Jean Nathan
6. Brooks Atkinson
7. Richard J. Foster
8. Richard A. Duprey
9. Henry Popkin
10. R. H. Gardner
11. C.W.E. Bigsby
12. Lois Gordon
13. John H. Ferres
14. Marvin Kitman
15. Neil Carson
16. Copyright

1. Arthur Miller