Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > King, Thomas (Vol. 171) - Sharon M. Bailey (essay date winter 1999)


King, Thomas (Vol. 171) - Sharon M. Bailey (essay date winter 1999)

Sharon M. Bailey (essay date winter 1999)

SOURCE: Bailey, Sharon M. “The Arbitrary Nature of the Story: Poking Fun at Oral and Written Authority in Thomas King's Green Grass, Running Water.World Literature Today 73, no. 1 (winter 1999): 43-52.

[In the following essay, Bailey analyzes how King approaches the subject of oral and written authority in Green Grass, Running Water.]

To speak of post-structuralist theory in conjunction with Native American literatures may seem as odd as serving dog stew with sauce béarnaise.

—Arnold Krupat, “Post-Structuralism and Oral Literature”

In Green Grass, Running Water a narrator and the trickster Coyote preside over two loosely interwoven plots: one based on the myth of the creation of the world, and one based on the quasi-realistic events on and near a Canadian Blackfoot reservation. In the myth plot the creation story is retold...

[The entire page is 8969 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the: