Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Chaplin, (Sir) Charles (Spencer) - Eric Bentley
Chaplin, (Sir) Charles (Spencer) - Eric Bentley
ERIC BENTLEY
There are things to find fault with in Monsieur Verdoux, but I should say that there is something heartening even in Charlie Chaplin's faults, because they are faults of excess, not of deficiency. If some scenes in Verdoux are puzzling, is it not because they might mean several things, not that they might mean nothing? In the revolutionary act of making the screen say something, Chaplin has made it say too much. There is more material in his latest film than he is able to manage—which is to say, more than any living dramatic artist could manage. (p. 161)
Chaplin takes the familiar moral dichotomy between the private life and the public, which in modern life has taken form as the dichotomy between the solid citizen's respectable Christian home and his dirty Machiavellian dealings in business, and he broadens the moral contrasts until they are expressible in terms of his own art, which is, if you like, slapstick. The strong contrast...
[The entire page is 1171 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Minnie Maddern Fiske
- Max Reinhardt
- G. W. Stonier
- Alexander Bakshy
- Barnet G. Braver-Mann
- Gilbert Seldes
- William Hunter
- Winston Churchill
- Otis Ferguson
- Louis Zukofsky
- Lewis Jacobs
- Otis Ferguson
- Basil Wright
- Northrop Frye
- James Agee
- Jean Renoir
- Al Capp
- Theodore Huff
- Gavin Lambert
- J. L. Tallenay
- Parker Tyler
- Vernon Young
- Penelope Houston
- FrançOis Truffaut
- Ernest Callenbach
- Dwight Macdonald
- Roger Ebert
- David Bordwell
- André Bazin
- Richard Schickel
- Stanley Kauffmann
- Colin L. Westerbeck, Jr.
- Ronald Tuch
- Eric Bentley
- Stanley Kauffmann
- Copyright
