Criticism > Contemporary Literary Criticism > Carrère, Emmanuel - Richard Eder (review date 22 July 1990)

1. Printable Version
2. Download PDF
3. Cite this Page
4. Tweet This

Richard Eder (review date 22 July 1990)

SOURCE: "Monster Frankenstein's Doctor," in Los Angeles Times Book Review, July 22, 1990, p. 3.

[Eder is a Pulitzer Prize-winning critic, journalist, and educator. In the following negative review of Gothic Romance, he complains that the plot and style of Carrère's novel are overly complicated and lacking in substance.]

Emmanuel Carrère's Gothic Romance turns the dicta of contemporary literary theory into a sardonic mystery novel; a play of twists and reverses that mocks the frontier between the fictional and the real. It is what Umberto Eco did in Foucault's Pendulum, and the two novels much resemble each other.

Both are consistently and sometimes joyously clever; both are remarkably good at creating a world of suspense. And in both, the deconstructionist or deflationary process—the joke to the effect that no figure in the story is any more real than something this...

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

eNotes Pass

1. Introduction
2. Principal Works
3. Criticism
   1. Philip H. Solomon (review date May 1987)
   2. John Gross (review date 1 April 1988)
   3. Oliver Conant (review date 17 April 1988)
   4. John Updike (review date 4 July 1988)
   5. Irving Malin (review date Spring 1989)
   6. Publishers Weekly (review date 25 May 1990)
   7. Richard Eder (review date 22 July 1990)
   8. Scott Winnett (review date November 1990)
   9. R. R. K. (review date November-December 1990)
   10. Faren Miller (review date December 1990)
4. Copyright