Cold War
Cold War | Nuclear Deterrence Was a Counterproductive Cold War Strategy
According to Richard Ned Lebow and Janice Gross Stein in the following viewpoint, nuclear deterrence fueled the arms race and increased tension between the United States and the Soviet Union. Indeed, nuclear deterrence provoked rather than restrained the two superpowers. For example, in the early years of the Cold War, the authors maintain, President John F. Kennedy’s boasts of nuclear superiority prompted Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev to install missiles in Cuba to protect Soviet interests there. Nuclear deterrence was not necessary to prevent major hostilities between the...
[The entire page is 2211 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
From Allies to Enemies: The Origins of the Cold War
- Chapter 1 Preface
- The United States Should Seek Peace with the Soviet Union
- The United States Should Not Seek Peace with the Soviet Union
- The United States Should Contain Soviet Expansion
- The Soviet Union Should Contain U.S. Imperialism
- Soviet Expansion Policies Initiated the Cold War
- U.S. Containment Policies Initiated the Cold War
-
Coexistence and Conflict
- Chapter 2 Preface
- The War in Korea Should Be Expanded
- The War in Korea Should Be Limited
- The Soviet Union Seeks Peaceful Coexistence with the United States
- The Soviet Union Does Not Seek Peaceful Coexistence with the United States
- The United States Could Have Won the War in Vietnam
- The United States Could Not Have Won the War in Vietnam
-
From Détente to the Cold War’s End
- Chapter 3 Preface
- Détente Is a Constructive
- Détente Is a Flawed U.S. Policy
- The United States Must Develop a Defensive Weapons System to Prevent Nuclear War
- U.S. Development of a Defensive Weapons System Would Increase Nuclear Proliferation
- Ronald Reagan’s Policies Ended the Cold War
- Mikhail Gorbachev’s Policies Ended the Cold War
- Reflections: The Impact of the Cold War
- For Further Discussion
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Cold War at eNotes.
