Cloning | Cloning Would Violate Human Dignity
Martin E. Marty, senior editor of the Christian Century magazine, is a professor of the history of religion at the University of Chicago and director of the Public Religion Project, a nonprofit group that analyzes the role of religion in American life.
Summary: The common reactions to the prospect of human cloning are revulsion and fear, but these feelings are based on deeper concerns. Though reproductive technologies have been applauded in the past because they produce children, cloning is different. Cloning assaults the distinctive genetic...
[The entire page is 1445 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Table of Contents
- Human Cloning Would Be Unethical
- Human Cloning Would Violate Christian Ethics
- Cloning Would Violate Human Dignity
- Human Cloning Would Violate the Dignity of Children
- Human Cloning Should Be Banned
- Animal Cloning Experiments Will Be Beneficial to Humans
- Animal Cloning May Be Acceptable Even If Human Cloning Is Unethical
- Cloning Can Be an Ethical Form of Human Reproduction
- Cloning Should Not Be Banned Out of Fear
- Human Cloning Has Not Been Proven Harmful
- Ethical Concerns About Cloning Are Misplaced
- Human Cloning Is Inevitable
- Human Cloning Experiments Should Be Allowed
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Cloning at eNotes.
