Criticism > Classical and Medieval Literature Criticism > The Book of Daniel - André LaCocque (essay date 1979)
The Book of Daniel - André LaCocque (essay date 1979)
André LaCocque (essay date 1979)
SOURCE: LaCocque, André. The Book of Daniel, translated by David Pellauer, pp. I-XX. Atlanta, Ga.: John Knox Press, 1979.
[In the following essay, LaCocque explores problematic issues relating to The Book of Daniel, discussing its authorship, status as apocalyptic literature, chronology, composition, canonical status, bilingualism, and structure.]
In the wide variety of literature which makes up Scripture, the Book of Daniel occupies a unique place.1 Its twelve chapters—in its present form—are divided into two major parts: the first six are ‘midrashim’ and the last five are ‘apocalypses’, while chapter seven serves as a transition between these two genres and participates in both of them.
Manifestly, with the Book of Daniel we are in a period of exploitation of ‘canonized’ material (or, in any case, material which is considered as having...
[The entire page is 8955 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- J. Dyneley Prince (essay date 1899)
- Robert Dick Wilson (essay date 1917)
- Charles Boutflower (essay date 1923)
- H. H. Rowley (lecture date 1950)
- E. W. Heaton (essay date 1956)
- Norman W. Porteous (essay date 1965)
- Richard J. Clifford (essay date December 1975)
- André LaCocque (essay date 1979)
- John G. Gammie (essay date April 1985)
- P. R. Davies (essay date 1985)
- P. R. Davies (essay date 1985)
- Shemaryahu Talmon (essay date 1987)
- André LaCocque (essay date 1988)
- Paul L. Redditt (essay date July 1998)
- Paul L. Redditt (essay date April 2000)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
