Criticism > Classical and Medieval Literature Criticism > Barbour, John - J. T. T. Brown (essay date 1900)
Barbour, John - J. T. T. Brown (essay date 1900)
J. T. T. Brown (essay date 1900)
SOURCE: "Of the Bruce," in The "Wallace" and the "Bruce" Restudied, P. Hanstein's Verlag, 1900, pp. 85-155.
[In the following excerpt, Brown argues that The Bruce has been extensively altered by a later editor.]
… John Ramsay's hand in The Bruce.
Do the Cambridge and Edinburgh manuscripts of The Bruce preserve the work of John Barbour in its original form, due allowance being made for fifteenth century orthography of the scribe: or do they exhibit the fourteenth century poem in a form more or less recast, amplified and embellished by an editor in the succeeding century? That question without doubt is of far more importance than anything concerning Barbour's authorship of The Stewartis Orygynalle, the Troy Book, Legends of the Saints or The Brut.
Some years ago, after repeated perusal of The Bruce, I began to suspect that another and...
[The entire page is 15343 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
- Principal Editions
-
Criticism
- W. A. Craigie (essay date 1893)
- Herbert Maxwell (essay date 1897)
- J. T. T. Brown (essay date 1900)
- Ian C. Walker (essay date 1964)
- Jacqueline Trace (essay date 1968)
- A. M. Kinghorn (essay date 1969)
- Lois A. Ebin (essay date 1972)
- Walter Scheps (essay date 1972)
- Anne M. McKim (essay date 1981)
- Matthew P. McDiarmid and James A. C. Stevenson (essay date 1985)
- Phoebe A. Mainster (essay date 1988)
- Anne M. McKim (essay date 1989)
- Grace G. Wilson (essay date 1990)
- Liam O. Purdon and Julian N. Wasserman (essay date 1994)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
