Criticism > Classical and Medieval Literature Criticism > Alcestis, Euripides - D. J. Conacher (essay date 1988)

1. Printable Version
2. Download PDF
3. Cite this Page
4. Tweet This

D. J. Conacher (essay date 1988)

SOURCE: Conacher, D. J. Introduction to Alcestis, by Euripides, translated and edited by D. J. Conacher, pp. 29-55. Wiltshire, England: Aris & Phillips Ltd, 1988.

[In the following excerpt, Conacher provides background on the Alcestis, explores the question of whether it should be considered a satyr-play, and analyzes its themes and structure.]

I. ANCIENT INFORMATION

Our information concerning the date and other features of the production of the Alcestis is drawn from the second “Hypothesis” to our play …. A “Hypothesis”, in this context, refers to a notice, dating back to the time of the Alexandrian editing of Greek tragedies (and, possibly, sometimes earlier), which was prefixed in our MSS to most of the extant plays, and provided what was to be understood as the basis of the play concerned. Some Hypotheses, such as the first one (attributed to...

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

eNotes Pass

1. Introduction
2. Principal Works
3. Criticism
   1. William Arrowsmith (essay date 1974)
   2. D. J. Conacher (essay date 1988)
   3. Charles Segal (essay date 1993)
   4. Kiki Gounaridou (essay date 1998)
4. Further Reading
5. Copyright

1. Ancient Greece
2. Euripides