Home > The Chairs Summary & Study Guide > Essays and Criticism > Ionesco’s The Chairs’
The Chairs | Ionesco’s The Chairs’
Jacobs discusses the nature of absurdity as it
applies to drama. He argues that The Chairs, rather
than being an example of theatre of the absurd, is
actually ‘‘straightforward and obvious good sense.’’
Absurd, absurd, absurd. It’s time to put this silly misrepresentation of avant-garde playwrights to rest. As for Samuel Beckett, he is melancholy, hopeless, pessimistic, pejoristic, and this is not absurd. It’s a conviction of man’s brutality and life’s difficulty. Living through obscene poverty and the ferocity of Hitler’s Germans, Beckett came to conclusions that are intelligent and sensible, not absurd.
But the case most at point is Eugene Ionesco’s brilliant play The Chairs. Rather than absurd, it is— at least for the vast majority of our population—...
[The entire page is 589 words long]
Join eNotes
The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:
Summary and Analysis – Themes – Characters – And much more...
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- The Chairs: Introduction
- The Chairs: Summary
- The Chairs: Eugene Ionesco Biography
- The Chairs: Characters
- The Chairs: Themes
- The Chairs: Style
- The Chairs: Historical Context
- The Chairs: Critical Overview
- The Chairs: Essays and Criticism
- The Chairs: Compare and Contrast
- The Chairs: Topics for Further Study
- The Chairs: What Do I Read Next?
- The Chairs: Bibliography and Further Reading
- The Chairs: Pictures
- Copyright
Tell a friend about The Chairs at eNotes.
