Shakespeare was a careless guy, or perhaps those who followed him were. Somewhere along the way, some of his plays were lost. How many plays were lost remains a matter of debate. Is Love’s Labours Won a lost sequel to Love’s Labours Lost or simply an alternative title to an existing play? Furthermore, of the lost plays, were all the sole creations of Shakespeare or were some of them collaborations. Since many believe The Bard’s later works were completed by other authors, it is possible that some of these missing stories fall into that category. It would explain their absence from folio copies and, ultimately, their disappearance into obscurity.

One such play is Cardenio, a play whose text has never been found (the story is believed to be based on the legend of Don Quixote). Many scholars argue that certain later plays are reconstructions or reworkings of Cardenio, but as always there is little conclusive evidence. None of this stopped playwrights Charles Mee and Stephen Greenblatt from tackling the work for a new production at the American Repertory Theatre. Using a framework device (gee, I wonder where they got that idea), the play depicts a wedding party reenacting the long-lost story. Mee and Greenblatt’s work is more of an historical interrogation than an attempt to recreate the work as exactly as possible. In many ways, their Cardenio is an examination of an intriguing phenomenon: the potential of rediscovering Shakespearean works that have never been read or performed.

Posted Fri, 02 May 2008 05:35:17 and filed under Love's Labours Won, Love's Labours Lost, Cardenio. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.