The Shakespeare Blog

I Don’t Think That’s a Dagger: Macbeth in the Buff

Tuesday, July 17th by scott malia

Washington Shakespeare Company is giving Shakespeare a dressing down. As the capper on a half-year festival, they are staging Macbeth au natural and drawing decidedly mixed reviews. While I’m sure some critics are tsk-tsking the production for pandering to prurient interests, I suspect a different motive: concept exhaustion. We’ve all seen King Lears set in feudal Japan or As You Like Its restaged in S&M clubs; even the novelty of going back to a plain old Elizabethan staging of Shakespeare no longer seems like a rediscovery. So what else are a director and a cast eager to re-re-re-conceptualize Elizabethan drama supposed to do? Take it back beyond the basics and strip the play (and the actors) down. Maybe it’s not a bad idea. Although, in a theatrical climate where even Harry Potter himself is letting it all hang out (in a recent stage production of Equus), maybe a Macnude Macbeth isn’t all that Macnovel.

They might have taken a lesson from a recent L.A. production that staged Hamlet in the Hollywood Forever Cemetery. In this case, the setting provides all the needed shock value as the crypts of real-life Hollywood royalty such as Douglas Fairbanks (one of the original founders of United Artists) become backdrops for the scenes. Now, I don’t know if there’s a Doug Fairbanks, Jr., Jr. out there, but I can’t help wondering if he’s thrilled about the idea of a bunch of thesps cavorting about on grandpa’s grave, regardless of how much iambic poetry they’re reciting.

Suddenly, a bunch of naked people doesn’t seem so bad in comparison.

Leave a comment:

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Lookup any word on eNotes with our dictionary. Highlight the word and press SHIFT + D for a definition, or SHIFT + T for a synonym.