The English Teacher Blog

Archive for the 'Spelling' Category

Can you spell “distressing”?

Monday, October 6th, 2008

Young learners in Gloucestershire, England, will no longer be tested in spelling, at least at one school.

Whitminster Endowed Church of England Primary School has suspended the practice. Head Teacher Debbie Marklove explained to parents that some students could spell the words perfectly at home but were unable to do the same for their teachers at school the next day. “Also,” she commented, “many children find this activity unnecessarily distressing.”

Teachers will continue to teach spelling, and it will be assessed in student writing, just not in traditional spelling tests.

I can see why parents might object to suspending the tests — they’re a staple of English class. If today we give up on spelling tests, what might we leave out tomorrow? Parts of speech? Shakespeare?

But really, there’s more than one way to determine how well a student spells. I applaud the teachers of Whitminster Endowed Church of England Primary School for trying something different. I hope they will keep track of the results of this approach and publish them for the rest of us.

Spelling

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

“A weed,” wrote Ralph Waldo Emerson, “is a plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered.”

Take the lupine, for example. In England it is cultivated and exhibited at garden shows. In New Zealand, on the other hand, it is considered an invasive weed. (Tourists are sometimes privately called “lupies.”)

When I taught in Australia, one of the first things I had to buy was an Oxford Dictionary. As I graded papers, I never marked spelling until I had looked up each word. Eventually I got used to jewellery, and spellings like traveller made so much sense that I adopted them. This was fine until I started teaching in the States again. Now I have extra spelling demons as a reminder that American English has not yet discovered the virtues of that orthography.

Laura Fitzpatrick’s recent article in Time suggests that we might consider embracing frequently misspelled words and labelling them — sorry — labeling them simply variant spellings.

lupin garden

In an English garden

Teachers spend a lot of time weeding bad spelling from student papers. I have a whole shtick I do on “The Unhappy Divorce of Mr. and Mrs. Alot” ending in a restraining order which requires him to keep away from her and the kids, hence a lot. Probably every teacher has something similar to help students remember troublesome spellings. The fact is, though, that I know what a writer means when I see constructions like It costs alot of money. This form is not Standard Written English, but at what point might it be considered an acceptable variation, comparable to thruway or hiccup? When was the last time you saw doughnut completely spelled out?

Changes in language usually happen slowly and with much hand-wringing on the part of teachers. But it happens. Maybe we can save the hand-wringing for more important things.

Lupine, by the way, in England is spelled lupin.

Another perspective on the same subject.

Spelling always counts.

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

Some lines of work should just be closed to the spelling-impaired; sign-painting and, apparently, tattoo artist among them.

The Chicago Tribune reports that a tattoo parlor is being sued over a misspelled tattoo for the second time in 17 months. What was intended to be a tribute to a lost friend became a sore spot when the artist actually inked “Tommorow [sic] Never Promised Today. John P. R.I.P.”

In his defense, the tattooist claims that the client spelled it that way first.

There’s money to be made for the person who invents spellcheck for tattoo machines!

Special thanks to Jan!

Lookup any word on eNotes with our dictionary. Highlight the word and press SHIFT + D for a definition, or SHIFT + T for a synonym.