Animal Experimentation
Animal Experimentation | Chemical Testing on Animals Saves Lives
Gina Solomon is a senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council and an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.
Testing chemicals on animals helps protect human health. For example, studies have indicated that frogs and rats suffer adverse effects from pesticides such as atrazine, diazinon, and Dursban. Animal test results led to the banning of these products by the Environmental Protection Agency. Without adequate testing, humans are at risk from unknown chemical agents in the environment. Whenever...
[The entire page is 959 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
- Animals Are Entitled to Rights
- Animals Are Not Entitled to Rights
- Animal Testing Is Essential for Medical Research
- Animal Testing Is Not Essential for Medical Research
- Animal Testing Is Cruel and Does Not Benefit Medical Research
- Animal Testing Is Becoming More Humane
- The Animal Rights Movement Threatens Medical Progress
- Using Animals as Organ Donors May Save Human Lives
- Using Animals as Organ Donors Endangers Human Lives
- Experimentation on Nonhuman Primates Is Vital to Medicine
- Root_6
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Animal Experimentation at eNotes.
