America's Prisons
America's Prisons | Creative Sentencing May Not Provide Effective Alternatives
Creative sentencing is an effort to make punishment more meaningful by designing a sentence to rehabilitate an offender and serve the community. However, some creative sentences have been controversial. For instance, a mother convicted of child abuse agreed to be implanted with a Norplant contraceptive as part of her probation. In California, parole has been granted to convicted child molesters who agreed to undergo “chemical castration” to suppress their libidos. In the following viewpoint, Jeffrey Abramson asserts that creative sentencing may not provide effective alternatives to...
[The entire page is 1455 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Chapter 1: Are Prisons Effective?
- Chapter 1 Preface
- The Prison System Works
- The Prison System Does Not Work
- More Imprisonment Is Needed
- More Imprisonment Is Not Needed
- Imprisonment Reduces Crime
- Imprisonment Does Not Reduce Crime
- Privatization Would Benefit the Prison System
- Privatization Would Not Benefit the Prison System
- Chapter 1: Periodical Bibliography
- Chapter 2: How Should Prisons Treat Inmates?
- Chapter 3: Should Prisons Use Inmate Labor?
-
Chapter 4: What Are the Alternatives to Prisons?
- Chapter 4 Preface
- Parole Can Succeed as an Alternative
- Parole and Probation Have Not Succeeded as Alternatives
- Drug Treatment Can Succeed as an Alternative
- Drug Offenders Should Be Imprisoned
- Creative Sentencing Can Provide Effective Alternatives
- Creative Sentencing May Not Provide Effective Alternatives
- Shame-Based Punishment Can Be an Effective Alternative
- Shame-Based Punishment May Not Be an Effective Alternative
- Chapter 4 Periodical Bibliography
- For Further Discussion
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about America's Prisons at eNotes.
