Zemel v. Rusk
Legal Citation: 228 F. Supp 65 (D.C.D. Conn 1964)
Plaintiff
Louis Zemel
Defendants
Dean Rusk, U.S. Secretary of State; Robert F. Kennedy, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff's Claim
That it is unconstitutional for the secretary of state and attorney general to limit the location of travel of a citizen of the United States.
Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff
Leonard B. Boudin
Chief Defense Lawyer
Benjamin C. Flannagan
Judges
J. Joseph Smith, Circuit Judge; District Judge Claire; District Judge Blumenfeld
Place
U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
Date of Decision
20 February 1964
Decision
That restrictions to travel, if made in a nondiscriminatory fashion, were valid in the interests of national security.
Significance
The district court upheld, and the...
[The entire page is 1146 words long]
