United States ex rel. Standing Bear v. Crook
Legal Citation: 25 F.Cas. 695 (1879)
Petitioners
Standing Bear and other Ponca Indians
Respondent
George Crook, U.S. Army General
Petitioners' Claim
That confinement of American Indians by the U.S. Army violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioners
John L. Webster, Andrew J. Poppleton
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Genio M. Lambertson
Justice for the Court
Elmer S. Dundy
Place
Lincoln, Nebraska
Date of Decision
12 May 1879
Decision
The Court upheld Standing Bear's claim and ordered the Poncas released from U.S. custody.
Significance
The ruling established that Indians are "persons" under U.S. law and those who are not members of tribes have rights to challenge U.S. actions. Issues surrounding Standing Bear's...
[The entire page is 2581 words long]
