Shaw v. Shaw
Legal Citation: 17 Day Conn. 189 (1845)
Plaintiff
Emeline Shaw
Defendant
Daniel T. Shaw
Plaintiff's Claim
That she be granted a divorce on the ground of intolerable cruelty.
Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff
Sedgwick, Seymour
Chief Defense Lawyers
Church, Hubbard
Justices for the Court
Joel Hinman, Henry Waite, Chief Justice Thomas S. Williams (writing for the court)
Justices Dissenting
Samuel Church (William L. Storrs did not participate)
Place
Litchfield, Connecticut
Date of Decision
June 1845
Decision
The court denied Shaw her divorce.
Significance
This case illustrates why divorces were so rare during most of American history. Patriarchal rights were a given, spousal rape was not considered bodily harm severe enough to constitute cruelty,...
[The entire page is 1838 words long]
