Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Legal Citation: 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
Petitioner
Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation Center
Respondent
Robert Clyde Bustamonte
Petitioner's Claim
The appeals court erred when it held that the state had to prove that the person who gave consent to the police for a search had knowledge of the right to refuse consent.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Robert R. Granucci
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Stuart P. Tobisman
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
29 May 1973
Decision
When the state seeks to...
[The entire page is 2498 words long]
